Sunday, 19 February 2017

The Cell (2016)

Cell 2016 film poster 2.jpg

Directed byTod Williams
Produced by
Screenplay by
Based onCell
by Stephen King
Music byMarcelo Zarvos
CinematographyMichael Simmonds
Edited byJacob Craycroft
  • Benaroya Pictures[1]
  • International Film Trust
  • 120dB Films
  • Cargo Entertainment
  • The Genre Company[1]
  • Don Nafia
Distributed by Signature Entertainment (UK) [2]
Release date
  • June 10, 2016
Running time
98 minutes[2]
CountryUnited States
Box office$735,841[3]
Cell is a 2016 American science fiction horror film based on the 2006 novel of the same name by Stephen King. The film is directed by Tod Williams, produced by John Cusack, with a screenplay by King and Adam Alleca. The film stars Cusack, Samuel L. Jackson, and Isabelle Fuhrman. The film was released on June 10, 2016 to video on demand, prior to a limited release scheduled for July 8, 2016.[4] Cell is the second film adaptation of a King story to co-star Cusack and Jackson, after 1408 (2007).
Cell was not financially successful, and was critically panned.




When an evil electronic signal is broadcast across mobile networks worldwide, cell phone users are instantly and dangerously re-programmed into rabid killers. Heading north through New England to find his estranged wife and son, Clay Riddell is joined by a group of survivors to battle the horde of murderous “phoners” as their world descends into apocalyptic madness.[5][6]



The film is based on the 2006 novel of the same name by Stephen King. In March 2006 it was announced that Dimension Films had bought the film rights to the book and that Eli Roth would direct. Bob Weinstein, the head of Dimension Films, stated that Roth would make the film after finishing Hostel 2.[7] In February 2007 Dimension hired Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski to write the screenplay.[8] On June 15, 2007, Eli Roth posted in his Myspace blog that he would not be directing Cell "anytime soon", as he planned to spend the rest of the year writing other projects. On July 10, 2009, he announced he had left the project, saying:
There was just sort of a difference in opinion on how to make the film and what the story should be, and there’s a different direction the studio wants to go with it. It was very friendly because it’s the Weinsteins, they made Inglourious Basterds and we’re all friends. I said, ‘I’m not really interested in doing the film this way. You guys go ahead and I’m going to make my own films.’ I’ve also learned that I really am only interested in directing original stories that I write, that’s another thing I learned through that whole process.[9]
On November 11, 2009, Stephen King announced at a book signing in Dundalk, Maryland that he had finished a screenplay. He stated that because fans didn't like the ending of the book, he had changed it for the film.[10]


John Cusack was the first actor announced to have joined the film in October 2012.[11] Samuel L. Jackson was cast as Tom McCourt in November 2013.[12] Isabelle Fuhrman was announced as Alice on February 5, 2014.[13] The next day, Stacy Keach was cast in an unnamed role of a headmaster.[14]
Filming took place in January 2014 over 25 days in Atlanta, Georgia.[15]


In February 2015, the producers of the film announced that Clarius Entertainment had acquired distribution rights.[16] The company, now called Aviron Pictures, later dropped the film.[17] Saban Films later acquired distribution rights to the film.[18] It was to receive its world premiere at FrightFest as part of the Glasgow Film Festival but was replaced at the last minute by Pandemic.[19] The film was released on June 10, 2016, to video on demand, prior to opening in a limited release on July 8, 2016.[1]

Critical reception[edit]

Cell was panned by critics.[20] On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 9% based on 44 reviews and an average score of 3.8/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "Shoddily crafted and devoid of suspense, Cell squanders a capable cast and Stephen King's once-prescient source material on a bland rehash of zombie cliches."[21] On Metacritic, the film has a score of 38 out of 100, based on 15 critics, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews".[22] Bob Grimm of CV Independent wrote that the movie "is easily one of the worst adaptations ever of a King story."[23] Arts BHAM's Corey Craft called the film "dull", "a trial to get through" and gave it 112 stars out of 5.[24] Nico Lang of Consequence of Sound wrote that Cell wasted an intriguing premise and called the film "unnecessarily glum and grim," as well as "pretty dumb."[25] Patrick Cooper of Bloody Disgusting called it a "forgettable adaptation" and further stated that "the story packs absolutely no punch and the solid stable of actors look bored for most of the film."[26]

No comments:

Post a Comment